Guide · 28 October 2026

Client using your work without paying? Your UK rights as a freelancer

You usually still own the copyright. Chase the invoice as a debt, and tell them to stop using the files until they pay or you agree a . Write the next contract so rights pass only on full payment.

Last updated 28 October 2026

TL;DR

The author is the first owner of copyright. Paying the invoice does not transfer it. Send a written demand for the fee and a stop-use request. Next time, rights pass only on full payment.

You do, unless you assigned it in writing. Under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s.11(1), the author is the first owner of copyright. The employee exception in s.11(2) applies to employees, not to freelancers. GOV.UK’s ownership guidance says a person working under a contract for services usually retains copyright unless there is a contractual agreement to the contrary.

Section 11 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is the starting point:

  • s.11(1). The author of a work is the first owner of any copyright in it, subject to the rest of the section.
  • s.11(2). Where a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, or a film, is made by an employee in the course of employment, the employer is the first owner, unless agreed otherwise.

A freelancer is not working under a contract of employment. You are working under a contract for services. GOV.UK’s Ownership of copyright works says courts treat that distinction as the line between s.11(2) and s.11(1), and that a person working under a contract for services will usually retain copyright in the works they produce unless there is a contractual agreement to the contrary.

The same GOV.UK page is blunt about commissioned work: when you ask someone to create a copyright work, the first legal owner is the person who created it, not the commissioner, unless you otherwise agree it in writing.

Copyright here is UK-wide. The money-claim procedure later on this page is England and Wales.

No. Paying the invoice does not transfer copyright. Section 90(3) of the 1988 Act says an assignment of copyright is not effective unless it is in writing signed by or on behalf of the assignor. A paid invoice, a verbal “it’s yours”, or sending the files does not move legal title. You remain the owner until that signed writing exists.

Section 90(3) is short and strict. An is a transfer of ownership. It has to be in writing, signed by you (or someone signing on your behalf). The client’s signature on a purchase order does not assign your copyright. Clearing the invoice does not assign it either.

What payment can do is trigger a clause you already signed: “on payment in full, the Freelancer assigns…”. That clause is the written assignment, and payment is the event that makes it bite. Without that clause, payment is only payment.

A licence is different. A licence is permission to use the work, not a transfer of ownership. Licences are not caught by s.90(3) in the same way. They can be implied, which is the next problem.

Can the client keep using the work if they have not paid?

They may have a limited implied licence to use the work for the purpose it was commissioned, even if copyright still sits with you. GOV.UK says that when copyright is not dealt with in the contract, courts may find an implied licence. That is not ownership. It is often a limited non-exclusive licence. Silence on the paper is the risk.

GOV.UK on commissioned works puts it this way: if copyright is not dealt with in the contract, courts may be willing to find an implied licence allowing the commissioner to use the work for the purpose for which it was commissioned. That does not transfer ownership. The commissioner may only get a limited non-exclusive licence.

That is the gap a silent brief creates. You delivered a logo for their website. They put it on the website. A court can read in permission for that use even while you still own the copyright. What the implied licence does not automatically give them is the right to sell the mark, to exclude you, or to treat the files as theirs.

The owner of copyright has the exclusive right to copy the work, issue copies to the public, communicate it to the public and adapt it (CDPA 1988 s.16). Doing those acts without a licence is infringement. The implied-licence argument is how a client says they had a licence. Your job is to shrink that argument: write the licence, name the uses, and tie it to payment.

stay yours either way. Libraries, components, presets and tools you brought to the job are licensed for this delivery, not handed over with the new work.

They are two different claims. The invoice is a debt: they agreed to pay for the work. Copyright is a property right: without a licence they do not have permission to copy, publish or communicate the work to the public. You can chase the money, ask them to stop using the files, or both. One does not replace the other.

Keep the two letters in two piles, even if you send them on the same day.

Unpaid invoiceCopyright
What it isA debt. They agreed a fee and have not paid it.A property right. You own the work unless it was assigned in writing.
What you ask forThe fee, and for a business client statutory interest under the 1998 Act.That they stop copying, publishing or communicating the work, or that they take a licence on payment.
Where it goes nextA letter before action, then a money claim. See client will not pay.A written stop-use request. Infringement is a separate claim from the debt.
What a court cannot inventA due date that nobody agreed.An assignment that was never in writing and signed.

Settling the invoice does not, by itself, settle the copyright. If they pay and you still have not assigned anything in writing, you still own it. If they never pay and they keep the work live, you still have both claims.

Do not mix a without-prejudice settlement offer into the open demand. The chase for the fee is an open letter.

What should I do if a client is using my work without paying?

Gather the brief, contract, files, invoice and every email. Write once: the amount, the due date, that copyright has not been assigned, and that they must stop public use until they pay or you agree a licence. For a business client, add statutory interest under the 1998 Act. If they ignore you, start a money claim for the debt.

A working sequence:

  1. Evidence. The brief, proposal or freelancer agreement. The files you delivered and where they are now being used. The invoice, the due date, and the chase thread.
  2. Written demand for the fee. Invoice number, amount, original due date, account details, a short new deadline. For a business client, statutory interest at 8% above Bank of England base rate plus the fixed recovery sum under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998. GOV.UK on late commercial payments states that rate. We do not print a base-rate figure here because it changes. This right does not apply to a consumer client.
  3. Stop-use request. In the same letter or a second one: copyright has not been assigned under CDPA 1988 s.90(3); they have no licence to copy, publish or communicate the work to the public except any limited use you are willing to allow until payment; they must confirm they have taken it down from named places by a short deadline.
  4. Letter before action, then a money claim. Fourteen days for a company, 30 days if the debtor is an individual. Then a specified money claim through Money Claim Online or the HMCTS online service. Small claims in England and Wales go up to £10,000. Do not guess the court fee. The full sequence is in What do I do when a client won't pay my freelance invoice.

The stop-use request is the copyright side. The money claim is the debt. You can run both. This page does not invent a copyright-specific court fee or a take-down procedure beyond that written request.

If the job was never on paper, you can still chase. A contract can be formed by emails, a brief and doing the work. What you cannot point to is an assignment on payment that nobody signed.

How does a contract that passes rights only on full payment prevent this?

Write that copyright, or any licence to use the work, passes only on full payment. Until then they have no right to publish. That is the line you point to when the logo is live and the invoice is still open. Agree it on one shared draft before you start, not in a later email thread.

Three sentences do the work:

  • Assignment or licence, on payment only. Ownership, or the right to use the work, moves when the invoice is cleared, not when you email the files. See intellectual property assignment.
  • Pre-existing materials stay yours. Licensed for this job, not assigned. See pre-existing materials.
  • A pause right if an invoice is overdue, so you are not still supplying files while the last invoice sits.

Example

Copyright and any licence to use the Deliverables pass to the Client only on payment in full. Until then the Client has no right to copy, publish, communicate or adapt the Deliverables except as the Freelancer agrees in writing. Pre-existing materials stay with the Freelancer and are licensed only as part of the Deliverables. If an invoice is unpaid 7 days after it is due, the Freelancer may pause the work and may revoke any temporary permission to use unpaid work.

In Plain English: they do not own it, and they may not use it, until they have paid. Your old libraries stay yours. If they are a week late, work stops and any stop-gap permission comes back.

A graphic design contract is the usual home for that split between finals, working files and libraries. A freelancer agreement carries the same ownership line for other kinds of job.

That clause is what you later quote. An implied licence is much harder to argue once the paper says there is no licence until payment.

Draft a graphic design contract with Lex

Free for the other side

Lex drafts it in Plain English beside the legal wording. Share one link; both sides agree and sign.

How does contracts.io help you keep rights until you are paid?

On Contracts.io both sides draft, negotiate and one shared contract, so the ownership line is the version you both signed. Start from a graphic design contract or a freelancer agreement. The client opens one link. Nobody emails v4_final.docx back and forth. Rights that pass only on payment are then the signed words, not a hope.

You describe the job in a sentence. Lex drafts the agreement. You share one link. The client can Accept, Counter or Decline on that same version, then both of you e-sign it. The other side never pays and does not need an account.

That does not chase an invoice for you. It does mean the IP assignment, the licence and the pause right are the words you both signed, not a line lost in email.

Sources

Frequently asked questions

If the client paid a , do they own the work?

No. A deposit is a slice of the fee. It is not an assignment. Copyright still sits with you unless you assigned it in writing, signed. A well-written contract credits the deposit to the fee and still passes rights only on payment in full.

What if there is no written contract at all?

You still own the copyright: s.11(1) does not need a signed agreement to make you first owner. You can still chase the fee if emails and the brief show they asked for the work. What you cannot point to is a written assignment, a named due date, or a that nobody agreed.

Can I ask them to take the work down as well as paying the invoice?

Yes. The invoice is the debt. The stop-use request is the copyright. Send both in writing, name where the work is being used, and keep the two asks distinct so a later money claim stays a specified debt.

Does statutory apply while they are using the work?

For a business-to-business invoice, yes: the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 implies statutory interest at 8% above base rate plus a fixed recovery sum. It does not apply to a consumer client. Using the work does not change that.

What happens to my pre-existing materials and libraries?

They stay yours. The new work made for this client can be assigned on payment; the libraries, components and presets you already owned are licensed for this job. Write that split down. A client who paid for a logo did not buy your template file.

Should I assign copyright or grant a licence?

Assignment moves ownership. A licence keeps ownership with you and grants named uses. Photography, illustration and reusable code often licence. Brand work often assigns on payment. Either way, the right should pass only when the invoice is cleared.

The legal wording governsLast reviewed 28 October 2026Pending lawyer review